Back in the days when I labored in the sweat-kitchens of the business
world, I almost always had to handle more work than I could
comfortably digest. I’d arrive home late, fix myself a quick bachelor-supper
and crash on my sofa for a few hours while my brain slowly unclenched itself.
If I was still awake at the end of the unclenching process, I’d go out for a
walk. I’d do the dishes tomorrow. Cleaning out the refrigerator could wait
until next month or whenever the leftover lemons became mummified -- whichever
came first. That book I planned to write could wait even longer, though I'd
want to start it before I became mummified myself.
I knew there wasn’t enough time in the day to accomplish everything I
needed to accomplish. But unlike a lot of my time-squeezed peers, I never
wished for a longer day. Twenty-four hours seemed to be more than enough for
me, and I eagerly bedded down at the end of the daily cycle.
It’s not as if we can do anything about the length of our day, anyway. We’re
stuck on a planet that plays hide-and-seek with the sun on an endless
twenty-four hour repeating loop. If we arbitrarily expanded the day to, say,
twenty-seven hours, we’d have to acclimate ourselves to midnight sun and
noontime dusks on a staggered schedule that would befuddle the best of us. We
should count our blessings that we don’t live on Venus, where it takes the
equivalent of 117 earth-days to go from midnight to midnight. Can you imagine
how much infernal busywork your boss would expect you to accomplish before
sunset? If you worked one-third of the Venusian day, you’d be putting in
roughly 940 hours at a stretch -- and good luck bargaining for extra coffee
breaks. Living on Jupiter would take it to the other extreme. That obese
planet requires less than ten hours to complete one rotation on its axis. You’d
probably have to get by on two hours of sleep, and you could forget about
taking lunch. Naturally, your boss would still expect eight hours’ worth of
daily production out of you.
No, our traditional twenty-four hour day isn’t the problem. The problem
is the seven-day week.
In the year-and-a-half that I’ve been writing a weekly column, I’ve
become acutely aware of the week as an omnipresent, unyielding unit of time.
You’d think it would be a cushy job, cranking your brain every seven days to
grind out another thousand words of intellectual sausage. But now that I’m
married and the proud owner of a century-old home, I have other
responsibilities to handle... more plates to keep spinning on poles before
they crash to the floor and alarm the cat. You’d be amazed at how
frighteningly fast a week can flutter by... how little time there is to think
amusing thoughts when you're plunging a clogged toilet.
As for those of you who work a torturous five-day-a-week job AND own a home
AND have a spouse PLUS kids to keep well-fed and humored -- not to mention
tending to your own short-term survival needs through diet, exercise,
meditation and an occasional shopping binge, plus the demands of your garden,
your pets, your e-mail, your relatives and in-laws, your recreational reading
and your roof gutters -- surely you’ve concluded by now that the seven-day
merry-go-round is a sorry farce. It doesn’t grant you nearly enough time for
a salubrious and well-ordered life. You submit to having your nerves
fricasseed five days a week, then you’re granted two days to recover. But
what a great cosmic joke! The weekend turns out to be even more grueling than
the work-week, as you race to check off all those niggling little items on
your to-do list that you would have been checking off all week if you hadn’t
been so confoundedly exhausted.
No, the seven-day slugfest we call a week has been tried and found severely
wanting. We clearly need to extend the week by a day, even two. That way the
weary worker would gain some desperately needed time to recover from the
ravages of the work-week, tackle those maddeningly insistent household chores
(like disposing of mummified lemons) and set aside perhaps half a day for
actual recreation. Yes, a nine-day week would fill the bill nicely. Employers
could still squeeze a full five days out of their hired help, but everyone
would return to the office vibrant and ruddy-faced on Monday following the
four-day weekend.
The seven-day week as we know it corresponds to nothing in the natural or
celestial world. Unlike the day, the month or the year, it isn't based on the
ancient movements of the earth, moon or sun. The only reason we use it is
that, according to the Book of Genesis, the Good Lord labored six days to
create the world and rested on the seventh. That's fine for a supreme deity.
But how many of us flimsy earthlings possess the creative power, omniscience,
drive or stamina of the Almighty? We’re comparing apples and ambrosia here.
If divine Providence needed a full day to kick back and rest His weary sinews
after a week’s work, then how much more time do we perishable humans need to
recharge our drained batteries?
Granted, we've made a little paltry progress since the days of Genesis.
Somewhere between the Industrial Revolution and the age of the assembly line,
enlightened employers acknowledged (or were forced to acknowledge) that we
needed a two-day weekend. So they grudgingly cut the work-week back from six
days to five. I’m not advocating any further cuts, you understand... I’m
simply calling for an extension of the weekend from two days to four. The
nine-day week is friendly to work and workers alike.
What would we call the two new days? Here are a few possibilities: Homeday,
Funday, Saneday, Playday, Snoozeday, Slackerday, Catchupday. If you prefer, we
could continue the ancient tradition of naming days after defunct gods or
heavenly bodies, or both (though we might want to stay away from Uranusday).
We could try names that would please Dr. Seuss, like Sneetchday or Snozzleday.
But the important thing is not how we name them, but that we create
them.
The nine-day week: you heard it here first. Write your Congressman today!
(Don't wait until Snozzleday.) And please don’t spoil the fun by mentioning
that a nine-day week would trim fifty-odd days off the work year. We wouldn’t
want the bosses to find out.
Cynic’s Pick of the Week