Your Host, Rick Bayan
What Is Cynicism?
How To Know If You're A Cynic
714 Things To Be Cynical About
What Are You Cynical About?
Cynic's Message Board
Rick's Notebook
Cynic's Dictionary Sampler
Order The Cynic's Dictionary
Cynic's Hall Of Fame
Other Sites For Cynics
Cynic's Mailbag
Spread The Word!

Rick's Notebook

Profile of the author
Archive of past tirades
Weekly columns

 
Rick's November Tirade

Not Just Another Obscure Ethnic Group

Nations are a lot like people: they can be soulful or expedient, overbearing or submissive, dutifully diligent or devoted to merriment. They're given to bouts of sulking, squabbling, boasting, violence and even madness. They hold grudges and, when their grievances aren't redressed, tend to seek bloody vengeance like cuckolded Jordanian husbands. Their vanity can be insufferable, whether they're nuclear superpowers or sheep-infested Balkan republics.

Nations have their neuroses, too. My own ancestral homeland, Armenia, can serve as a prime example. For most of the past century, this ancient Caucasian tribe has been struggling to emerge from a long funk brought on by a combination of crushing disasters and classic self-defeating behavior.

Armenia has always attracted more than its share of misfortune, the way trailer parks seem to lure tornadoes: we're looking at a nation reduced by history to a patch of stony turf the size of Maryland, sitting astride one of the world's most irritable seismic zones, nearly devoid of natural resources but amply surrounded by malevolently grinning enemies, an island of Christianity in a sea of Islam, its people decimated by genocides and scattered to the winds like dandelion seeds. An earthquake ten years ago leveled numerous cities and towns, killed over 25,000 and sent thousands more packing for steadier ground. But somehow the nation has clung to its nationhood for three millennia.

Newly independent after seventy years of frustrated submission to Soviet rule, Armenia should have been embarking on a national renaissance. Its scientists should have been raking in Nobel Prizes and its celebrated brandy should have been warming the innards of connoisseurs around the world. Instead, the Soviet era is beginning to look like a lost golden age.

A recent war to reclaim the independence of a neighboring Armenian enclave in Azerbaijan – though stunningly successful as a military operation and a triumph of national grit – drained the country's resources, and a resulting blockade severed its links to vital supplies. Residents of Yerevan, the once-elegant capital, had to resort to felling trees in the city's parks for fuel during the brutal Armenian winter.

So yes, my old fatherland has borne more than its fair share of woes. But it continues to perpetuate those woes in a manner that makes me shake my head in sorrowful cynical bemusement. The recent murderous attack on its parliamentary leaders was just the latest evidence of a palpable kink in the national psyche.

The most common adjective used to describe Armenia is "beleaguered" – like Job, like Republicans at Berkeley, like a corporation in dire need of a turnaround before its share price sinks below the one-dollar level. It's an appropriate adjective for a nation in trouble, but it misses the psychological underpinnings of Armenia's peculiar plight. I submit that the story of Armenia is that of a gifted underachiever, thwarted by unfortunate circumstances and an unhealthy dose of self-sabotage.

It used to be said in the Middle East that it takes five Turks to outsmart a Greek, five Greeks to outsmart a Jew, and five Jews to outsmart an Armenian. I have a sneaking suspicion that this adage was coined by Armenians, but the fact is that we've always had a reputation for mental acuity. Why, then, have we produced no writers of international repute other than the sadly forgotten William Saroyan? Why so few movie titans, famous scientists or world-class figures in any field? We're a small nation, yes – but so are the Jews. Yet on any roster of worthies listed in descending order of eminence, you'd have to scroll past five hundred Jewish names before you've dug up a dozen notable Armenians.

You'll find successful Armenians by the bushel in every respectable profession – doctors, lawyers, dentists, engineers, academics, classical musicians. But our diligent professionalism is both our strength and our curse: you won't encounter any Armenian earthshakers on the order of Freud, Beethoven, Darwin, Copernicus or Galileo. Dr. Kevorkian has his admirers, but he's an odd bird – a lone misguided renegade – and not exactly a name for the ages.

The Armenian mindset, on the whole, prizes respectability above originality. Our literature is mainly religious, historical or soaringly nationalistic – no magnificent word-conjurers like Shakespeare or Rabelais in our midst. In our community a successful jeweler enjoys more prestige than a struggling essayist, as perhaps he should. Our newspapers are filled with obsequious profiles of "internationally renowned" orthodontists and plastic surgeons. ("Internationally renowned" is always a badge of validation among Armenians; it means that others must approve of us.) At social gatherings you see the men conferring in small flocks, penguinlike with their short necks, dark suits and genial rectitude. They crave respectability as if it were made of the finest Swiss chocolate.

This driving need for prestige lies behind the Armenian tendency to puff up our significance, at least among our own people. We have to keep reminding ourselves that we were the first Christian state, that Armenians developed the rudiments of Gothic architecture (The clustered pier! The pointed arch!), and of course that Noah's Ark came to rest on our own Mount Ararat, which now looms wistfully out of reach just across the Turkish border. We Armenians haven't forgotten that Lord Byron praised our language as the one to use when speaking to God. Armenia gave apricots and cherries to the Western world, and the Garden of Eden was presumably located, according to the best evidence, in – well, you can probably guess where Armenians claim it was located.

I studied history in college at least partly to uncover what I could about the distant past of my ancestral land, and what I uncovered thoroughly demoralized me. We were there at the beginning, all right – yet only as a footnote nation, always on the periphery of the action but never in the cockpit. When I'd look up references to Armenia in the index of a history book, what I'd invariably find was something like "the emperor's army advanced through Cappadocia, Pontus and Armenia." Only one Armenian in history – King Tigran the Great, who ruled from about 95 to 55 B.C. – ever imposed his will on the world at large, carving out a brief but spectacular empire for himself before the Romans rolled in and snatched most of it away. Yes, there were some mighty Byzantine emperors of Armenian extraction, but they considered themselves Greek – and nobody would recognize their names anyway.

It could be that Western historians have simply overlooked our plucky little civilization; after all, most of them can't decipher our texts. It could be that we haven't had the chance to rewrite history our way, because we've generally been on the losing end of it. Whatever the reason, Armenia has had to settle for an occasional walk-on role in the cast of nations. For a land so ancient to be so marginalized would be enough, you'd think, to make us a dour and cynical tribe. Yet somehow we're eternally hopeful of proper recognition, of due respect, of PRESTIGE.

It wounds the Armenian ego when people confuse us with Albanians or Rumanians. We're not just another obscure ethnic group, after all. Yet the fact remains that there are individual CELEBRITIES who enjoy greater name-recognition than Armenia. Not only megastars like Madonna and Tom Cruise, but semi-entities like Howard Stern, Celine Dion and even Geraldo Rivera, at least in America, are currently more famous than our 3,000-year-old nation. For that matter, so are the Toronto Blue Jays and USA Today. So are Hostess Twinkies and Amazon.com. So is Purina Dog Chow.

You won't glimpse any Armenian characters in American movies and television, or, for that matter, more than one or two bona-fide Armenian actors per generation. (We're too congenitally sober for the loose-limbed antics of show business.) Nobody other than an Armenian knows what an Armenian accent sounds like, or that we have our own 36-letter alphabet, or that "rice pilaf" is an Armenian concoction. We tried for decades to bring the bestselling novel "Forty Days of Musa Dagh" (about a heroic resistance by Armenians during World War I) to the big screen. A low-budget version finally surfaced and didn't produce a ripple; I believe it finally made the rounds primarily at Armenian civic functions. You're looking at a nation that desperately needs a good press agent.

But if you want to understand the demons that bedevil the Armenian psyche, you have to see beyond the mere sting of undeserved obscurity. The pivotal event in Armenian history – the swirling vortex of despair that continues to suck the life out of the nation eighty years later – is the notorious "alleged" genocide that took place in the Turkish Empire during World War I.

Out in the dusty and remote Armenian provinces, on the high plateau between the Black Sea and the mountains of Kurdistan, something catastrophic happened: over a million Armenians – men, women, babies and all – were abruptly butchered or driven into the Syrian Desert to perish from thirst, hunger and exposure. That much we know.

Armenians claim to have proof that the massacres were deliberately instigated by the Turkish government as a systematic plan of genocide – the first such mass-extermination of the twentieth century. Several leading British and American observers at the time corroborated their claim.

Meanwhile, the Turks insist that any Armenian victims were unavoidable casualties of war – that they were collaborating with the Russians to secure their independence and had to be transported from the area. No doubt it's true that a small minority of Armenian radicals were agitating for a breakaway state. Still, when two-thirds of a nation's population is expunged from the land of the living, you can reasonably conclude that the victims weren't simply bad travelers.

At the close of the war, a tiny sliver of historic Armenia enjoyed two and a half years of freedom before being whisked into the Soviet orbit. That downsized remnant, further trimmed by Stalin as if to tweak our famously majestic noses, formed the outlines of today's independent Armenian republic.

What used to be Turkish Armenia is now a vast and arid wasteland, the scrubby haunt of Kurdish herdsmen who stable their flocks in the ruins of our ancient stone churches. Just as the windswept landscape is devoid of Armenians, the Turkish revisionists have banished us from their history books as well. Read any Turkish-prepared guide to their nation and you won't find a trace of that troublesome vanished race.

Armenians, even more than Jews, are slow to forget past grievances. The Jewish people at least have had the verve and vision to engineer their own triumphs in the wake of their Holocaust. They keep reminding us of the past, yes – but they push forward with astounding vigor. They make waves and enjoy the turbulence. They create bestselling books and blockbuster films and stunning medical breakthroughs. Most important, they've built themselves a thriving nation in their ancient homeland.

Armenians still seem paralyzed by the dark events of World War I – partly because of the Turks' refusal to acknowledge the massacres, and partly because of our own childlike sense of wounded justice. That damnable sense of justice: It's not fair, we keep repeating to ourselves. How can we move on when we've been so grievously abused? We'll build more Genocide monuments, push more Genocide commemoration bills through Congress, establish an international moratorium on Genocide.

We're like rape victims whose minds are permanently and needlessly fixated on an incident that should finally be relegated to the past. We flagellate ourselves and continue to dwell on our sorrows.

I grew up with the knowledge of Armenian victimhood; we were the Genocide people, better known for our manner of dying than our mode of living. I used to bristle at the woeful passivity of it, at the plaintive bleating in our newspapers, the accursed inability to publicize our plight, the NEED to publicize our plight at all. I was more concerned about our future. In college I'd delight in drawing maps of a Greater Armenia as it expanded to its historic dimensions – and, for good measure, deep into the Turkish territories beyond our homeland. The establishment of a new independent republic in 1991 filled my jaded heart with hope; we were, finally, free to become something other than well-dressed victims.

I should have known better. Prolonged squabbling over the status of Karabagh – that Rhode Island-sized Armenian enclave trapped within the borders of Azerbaijan – has virtually destroyed the economy of the infant republic. Wild dogs and mafiosi prowl the streets of Yerevan. We're in a dizzying descent from our former status as the most prosperous and forward-looking of Soviet republics to something like a Middle Eastern version of Rwanda. Our annual Gross Domestic Product was recently calculated to be on the order of $600 per capita.

Then, suddenly, came the ghastly news that a handful of fanatics had gunned down eight of the top officials in the Armenian government, including the prime minister. Apparently these self-professed liberators had come to avenge their countrymen, to eliminate the "bloodsuckers" who were making life miserable for the people. One can see why they might have been disgruntled with their leaders. Plenty of good people around the world are disgruntled with their leaders. But they generally don't express their disgruntlement by mowing them down with semi-automatic rifles; if that were the case you'd have to step over corpses piled three deep in the aisles of the U.S. Congress.

We Armenians have long been a disputatious race; factionalism and assassination are mother's milk to us. We've endured endless years of religious and political infighting. We can't even agree on how to pronounce half the consonants in our own alphabet; one man's T is another man's D. That a nation so small can be so maddeningly at odds with itself is cause for consternation.

Yet my own experiences with Armenians have been anything but discordant. They glow warmly with the memories of savory old-country meals, grilled shish-kebabs and bowls of fruit served on summer evenings, gentle grandparents bouncing round-cheeked babies on their knees, dark vivacious women bustling about the kitchen, amused old men playing backgammon together on a hotel porch, kindly priests with white goatees sitting down to dinner with the family, childlike maiden aunts holding us spellbound with their tales. How can a people so full of love be so confoundedly hard on themselves, on each other?

It's worth noting that while Armenians typically love children and bond to their families for life, a disproportionate number of our people tend to remain single – at least in America. It could be that our Asiatic innocence makes it hard for us to adjust to the convoluted intrigues of American social and business life. But I suspect that Armenians simply aren't prolific breeders. Something in our genes militates against the propagation of our ancient traits on an epic scale. We'll never be an India.

Maybe nature can detect the self-defeating behavior of a tribe and work secretly to thwart its reproductive success. That would be a wanton crime, not only because we've been hanging around this planet since before the time of Homer, but because we have so much to offer – not the least of which is one of the world's most glorious and underrated cuisines. The loss of our ambrosial anoush-abour alone would make our disappearance an irreparable world tragedy.

But I seriously doubt if we're about to disappear anytime soon. Armenia has managed to survive as a nation through the worst of times, outlasting the Assyrians who fought us in the mountains south of Lake Van, defying the army of Alexander the Great, somehow enduring the wavelike onslaughts of the Persian, Roman, Byzantine, Arab, Mongol and Ottoman empires.

We're a smart and tenacious tribe. We've proven time and again that we can take a beating and come back for more. Now we just have to learn to stop beating ourselves.

 

Here's the complete archive of Rick Bayan's immortal tirades for your reading pleasure:

December 2002 — Hello, I Must Be Going
November 2002 — A Raving Moderate
August 2002 — Is Western Civilization Worth Saving?
July 2002 — To Scam or Be Scammed
June 2002 — I Read the News Today, Oh Boy
May 2002 — Speechophobia
April 2002 — Fanatics on Parade
March 2002 — The Prestige Gap: A Lament
February 2002 — On Becoming a Dullard
January 2002 — Art for Slackers
December 2001 — An Unsolicited Christmas Card
November 2001 — A Tale of Two Tribes
October 2001 — On the Fallen Towers
August 2001 — Why Do We Bother?
June 2001 — Notes from a Doomed Planet
May 2001 — The Museum of Discarded Names
April 2001 — Indecision
March 2001 — A Slight Case of Insanity
February 2001 — Letter to a Conscientious Critic
January 2001 — The Cynic's Inaugural Address
December 2000 — The 50th Tirade
November 2000 — Travel Advisory
October 2000 — Beyond Work
September 2000 — More Work
August 2000 — Work
July 2000 — The Doves' Nest
June 2000 — Great Affectations
May 2000 — Tale of a Virtual Village
April 2000 — The World Is My Obstacle Course
March 2000 — A Living Heck
February 2000 — On the Treachery of Time
January 2000 — A Letter to the Future
December 99 — Rare Bird
November 99 — Not Just Another Obscure Ethnic Group
October 99 — Extinction Reconsidered
September 99 — Good Life, Bad Life, Better Life
August 99 — Household Relics: An Elegy
July 99 — A Meditation on Profanity
June 99 — In Praise of Sloth
May 99 — A Bug's Death
April 99 — Obligations!
March 99 — The Courage to Be Ordinary
February 99 — A Grave Story
January 99 — What's Left for Men?
December 98 — On the Uses of Friends
November 98 — A Cynic's Thanksgiving
October 98 — Grand Illusions
September 98 — Filth
August 98 — Will the Real God Please Stand Up?
July 98 — Adventures in Downsizing
June 98 — Lady Longevity
May 98 — Uniquely Human, Uniquely Clueless
April 98 — The Mathematics of Excess
March 98 — Humbuggery
February 98 — Love and the Single Cynic
January 98 — By the Sweat of Your Brow
December 97 — Is Suffering Unfashionable?
November 97 — The Tao of Housekeeping
October 97 — The Sensory Deprivation Blues
September 97 — Down with Natural Selection!
August 97 — Noise
July 97 — On Eating Our Fellow Creatures
June 97 — Trouble in Book-Land
May 97 — Interview with an Unemployable Man
April 97 — The Cynic's Dream
March 97 — Inequalities
February 97 — Flesh and Mortality
January 97 — How to Be a Success
December 96 — Why I Can't Hate Christmas
November 96 — How I Became a Cynic



Profile of a Cynic...

Photo of Rick Bayan

Rick Bayan was born and raised in New Brunswick, New Jersey, where he enjoyed an idyllic suburban childhood—the perfect background for a lifetime of cynical disillusionment.  He has held a number of typical jobs for an idealistic liberal arts graduate, including assistant editor of Rubber Age and managing editor of Container News.  At Time-Life Books he was assigned to write about plumbing fixtures.  His work as copy chief for Day-Timers, Inc., has won five advertising awards, none of which has dampened his cheerfully morose view of business and life.  He has written three books, including "Words That Sell" and "The Cynic's Dictionary," and tons of junk mail.

Bayan, who claims to be a "kinder, gentler cynic," currently lives in Allentown, Pennsylvania.  Be sure to revisit this site each month and read the latest cynical installment from Rick's Notebook.


 

site design by:
<IMG SRC="lowf-logo.gif" WIDTH=151 HEIGHT=51 BORDER=0>